Back in 2016 when the Georgia legislature was considering "campus carry" I wrote about the irony of rules for faculty and staff that prohibit weapons on campus. I am updating that post as the latest "campus carry" bill awaits the governor's signature or veto.
(My money is on him signing it as the exceptions meet some of his concerns last year when he vetoed it)
Quite simply, if the governor signs into law "campus carry," UGA will have to think about its own rules that ban employees from having weapons on campus. There's probably a story here. Just saying.
UGA, in its employment section on workplace violence, says it's against the rules to "possess, use, or threaten to use an unauthorized weapon as defined by the Policy." What's a weapon? At the end of the page it defines a weapon as "any objects that may be used to intimidate, attack, or injure another person or to damage property" and then points you to a page that doesn't exist: http://www.police.uga.edu/weapons.html. Don't bother, it's a dead link. Here's an archived version or here is an updated version with a different URL that sums it up for you. I did all the work. Enjoy.
Take a look at that list of weapons. It includes bats. So you baseball and softball players, you're in technical violation of the law? Nope. There's an exception for "legitimate athletic purposes" and a whole long list of others the law doesn't apply to.
But the real point here is, if the governor signs into law "campus carry," I would think UGA will have to alter its rules some to allow faculty and staff the same access to concealed carry of a weapon that the law would allow for students who are over 21 and meet all the other requirements. That's a good question to ask the administration, I suppose, as if the governor signs the law it will go into force (I think) July 1.
Random blog posts about research in political communication, how people learn or don't learn from the media, why it all matters -- plus other stuff that interests me. It's my blog, after all. I can do what I want.
Showing posts with label UGA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UGA. Show all posts
Sunday, April 2, 2017
Wednesday, October 26, 2016
Students By State at UGA
There have been dramatic shifts in what states send undergraduates to the University of Georgia over the last several years. Looking at full-time undergrads from 2000 to 2016, South Carolina dropped from being the 2nd (only to Georgia itself) in 2000 to 8th in 2016. Tennessee dropped from 3rd to 7th, and Louisiana from 7th to 12th. But look at the growth states. North Carolina, up from 5th to 2nd, and Texas up from 9th to 4th.
In raw numbers, let's look at Texas. Back in Fall 2000, 107 full-time undergrads from Texas attended UGA. In Fall 2016, we have 227 Texans as full-time undergrads -- a 112 percent increase. And Maryland. Back in 2000 only 43 full-time undergrads hailed from there. This Fall, we have 164 students from Maryland -- a 281 percent increase.
When I have time I'll map it for you, but basically the border states send fewer students to UGA while populous, more distant, states send more students. Is it because students from nearby states are less competitive as UGA became over time more and more academically difficult to gain admission to? Or have schools in Maryland and Texas, among others, become harder to gain admission to, thus sending students this way? No idea, but it is interesting.
f
Rank
|
2016
|
2000
|
1
|
Georgia
|
Georgia
|
2
|
North Carolina
|
South Carolina
|
3
|
Florida
|
Tennessee
|
4
|
Texas
|
Florida
|
5
|
Virginia
|
North Carolina
|
6
|
Maryland
|
Alabama
|
7
|
Tennessee
|
Louisiana
|
8
|
South Carolina
|
Virginia
|
9
|
New Jersey
|
Texas
|
10
|
New York
|
New York
|
In raw numbers, let's look at Texas. Back in Fall 2000, 107 full-time undergrads from Texas attended UGA. In Fall 2016, we have 227 Texans as full-time undergrads -- a 112 percent increase. And Maryland. Back in 2000 only 43 full-time undergrads hailed from there. This Fall, we have 164 students from Maryland -- a 281 percent increase.
When I have time I'll map it for you, but basically the border states send fewer students to UGA while populous, more distant, states send more students. Is it because students from nearby states are less competitive as UGA became over time more and more academically difficult to gain admission to? Or have schools in Maryland and Texas, among others, become harder to gain admission to, thus sending students this way? No idea, but it is interesting.
f
Tuesday, July 12, 2016
Rankings and AAU
I've written before, wondering aloud as to UGA's chances of ever being invited to the Association of American Universities, the big-kid club of research universities. I speculated in previous posts about whether UGA produces enough research -- and research dollars -- given it doesn't have a medical school. It takes big bucks to be asked to the academic prom. Today I approach this from a slightly different angle, comparing AAU membership to the world university rankings that came out this week.
Let's take a look.
The table below orders all the AAU members by their world rankings. Skim it. UGA would be in the bottom of the pile (I put it in the place where it'd sit, via rankings), but it's still better than seven other AAU members. What does this prove? Not much. AAU and the world rankings do rely on some of the same measures, so if you're pulling for UGA to get invited there's a little something here for you, but keep in mind the schools UGA beats in the world rankings (but are members of AAU) have been in for a long time. Missouri, for example, joined in 1908, Kansas in 1909, and the most recent being Buffalo in 1989.
Check on the list below with their respective world rankings. I have a little speculation at the bottom of the list.
Who ranks high but isn't a member? Good question, because I'd assume those schools would be competing for an invite with UGA.
Dartmouth isn't a member. Surprised me, but it's ranked #50 in the world. The University of Utah is ranked #66 but isn't a member. Those are far above UGA's #204 ranking, and there are several other schools who aren't in the club but rank higher.
My take? UGA is several years away from an invite despite it's #17 Forbes best public school ranking (also out this week). Medical and engineering programs generate lots and lots of research grant dollars, and UGA's small programs in each are nowhere close to that kind of success and prestige.
Let's take a look.
The table below orders all the AAU members by their world rankings. Skim it. UGA would be in the bottom of the pile (I put it in the place where it'd sit, via rankings), but it's still better than seven other AAU members. What does this prove? Not much. AAU and the world rankings do rely on some of the same measures, so if you're pulling for UGA to get invited there's a little something here for you, but keep in mind the schools UGA beats in the world rankings (but are members of AAU) have been in for a long time. Missouri, for example, joined in 1908, Kansas in 1909, and the most recent being Buffalo in 1989.
Check on the list below with their respective world rankings. I have a little speculation at the bottom of the list.
SCHOOL | World Rank |
Harvard University | 1 |
Stanford University | 2 |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 3 |
Columbia University | 6 |
University of California, Berkeley | 7 |
The University of Chicago | 8 |
Princeton University | 9 |
Yale University | 10 |
California Institute of Technology | 11 |
Cornell University | 12 |
University of Pennsylvania | 14 |
University of California, Los Angeles | 15 |
Johns Hopkins University | 16 |
University of California, San Diego | 17 |
University of Michigan | 19 |
Northwestern University | 21 |
New York University | 22 |
University of Wisconsin–Madison | 25 |
University of Washington | 27 |
Duke University | 29 |
University of Toronto | 30 |
The University of Texas at Austin | 32 |
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign | 34 |
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | 38 |
University of Virginia | 40 |
McGill University | 42 |
Rutgers University–New Brunswick | 43 |
University of Southern California | 44 |
University of Minnesota | 45 |
Ohio State University | 46 |
University of Pittsburgh | 47 |
University of California, Davis | 49 |
Washington University in St. Louis | 51 |
The Pennsylvania State University | 52 |
Purdue University | 56 |
University of California, Santa Barbara | 58 |
University of Florida | 59 |
Boston University | 62 |
University of Colorado Boulder | 65 |
Carnegie Mellon University | 67 |
University of Maryland, College Park | 68 |
Vanderbilt University | 71 |
University of Rochester | 72 |
The University of Arizona | 73 |
Emory University | 79 |
Georgia Institute of Technology | 86 |
Brown University | 87 |
University of California, Irvine | 88 |
Texas A&M University | 98 |
Michigan State University | 106 |
Case Western Reserve University | 108 |
Rice University | 114 |
Indiana University Bloomington | 123 |
The University of Iowa | 125 |
Stony Brook University | 154 |
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA | 204 |
Iowa State University | 205 |
The University of Kansas | 206 |
University of Missouri | 209 |
Brandeis University | 229 |
State University of New York at Buffalo | 272 |
Tulane University | 288 |
University of Oregon | 342 |
Who ranks high but isn't a member? Good question, because I'd assume those schools would be competing for an invite with UGA.
Dartmouth isn't a member. Surprised me, but it's ranked #50 in the world. The University of Utah is ranked #66 but isn't a member. Those are far above UGA's #204 ranking, and there are several other schools who aren't in the club but rank higher.
My take? UGA is several years away from an invite despite it's #17 Forbes best public school ranking (also out this week). Medical and engineering programs generate lots and lots of research grant dollars, and UGA's small programs in each are nowhere close to that kind of success and prestige.
Friday, June 19, 2015
Huh?
And so I'm reading a story about UGA cops busting a gambling operation on campus and at the end of the story I see this graf
I think this because, ironically, I'd recently seen a story by the Alabama student newspaper praising UGA and how the UGA cops could speak directly to journalists instead of, like at Bama, going through the PR wing of the university -- which drastically slows up the news process plus, let's face it, puts a flak spin on everything.
I'm actually gonna ask about this policy and when (and why) it went into effect. Will report back if and when I get an actual response.
UGA police were unable to comment due to a university policy change this year that directs questions concerning all police matters to the Office of Public Affairs.and I think, what the fuck?
I think this because, ironically, I'd recently seen a story by the Alabama student newspaper praising UGA and how the UGA cops could speak directly to journalists instead of, like at Bama, going through the PR wing of the university -- which drastically slows up the news process plus, let's face it, puts a flak spin on everything.
I'm actually gonna ask about this policy and when (and why) it went into effect. Will report back if and when I get an actual response.
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
Searching for "J-school"
Search for "j-school" via Google (while not logged into Google, GMail, etc., and the first entry, of course, is the wikipedia article on "journalism school." After that, you get a list of schools and other stuff, all 588,000 hits. Where the school is listed below, it's the main site.
By the third page you start to get articles that use the term "j-school" in them, often in a disparaging manner, but not always so. Me, I'm a fan of the word.
- UC Berkeley
- UNC
- Missouri
- CUNY
- Columbia
- Kansas
- CUNY's Twitter account
- Florida's Twitter account
- Wisconsin
- A MOOC I've never heard of
By the third page you start to get articles that use the term "j-school" in them, often in a disparaging manner, but not always so. Me, I'm a fan of the word.
Labels:
google,
grady college,
j-school,
journalism programs,
UGA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)