Examples, you ask?
This 2017 study includes a cite of one of my older studies from, wow, 1995. The study here is about need for cognition and political knowledge.
And this 2017 study is about knowledge of nanotechnology and cites my 1995 and 1996 papers.
I could go on, but I'm bored and you're bored and it's a holiday week. I will take a second to point out my most cited works, which when compared to colleagues the numbers are not that great, but I'm the top cited person in my household. So there.
- By far #1 cited is my study of young people learning from late-night comedies. It's from 2005 and has triple the cites of my #2.
- So, #2 is that 1995 "new news" and knowledge piece discussed above.
- Close behind with only two fewer cites than the one above is another piece with a good title and data over time, which helped get it attention.
Fourth and fifth places are talk radio studies. I did a lot of those and they got me tenure. Sixth is maybe my favorite piece, a study of why people believe Obama is Muslim and one of the first of its kind. If I'd published it in a bigger journal is would have gotten a lot more attention, but that's the way it goes.