2012 Recruiting Ranking
|
2013 Recruiting Ranking
|
2014 Final Ranking
|
1. Alabama
|
1. Alabama
|
1. Ohio State
|
2. Texas
|
2. Ohio State
|
2. Oregon
|
3. Florida
|
3. Notre Dame
|
3. TCU
|
4. Ohio State
|
4. Florida
|
4. Alabama
|
5. Stanford
|
5. Michigan
|
5. Florida State
|
6. Florida State
|
6. LSU
|
5. Mich. State
|
7. Michigan
|
7. Mississippi
|
7. Baylor
|
8. USC
|
8. Auburn
|
8. Georgia Tech
|
9. Miami (Fl)
|
8. UCLA
|
9. Georgia
|
10. Auburn
|
10. Florida State
|
10. UCLA
|
Let's look at Georgia, given I work at UGA. The dawgs finished 9th this past season. They finished, according to Yahoo, with the #12 class in both 2012 and 2013, so I guess you could argue a #9 ranking means they slightly overperformed. The 2014 class was #7, for what that's worth. Call it even.
Using ESPN's data, you can see below how Georgia has done over time, as high as the #4 class in 2006, as low as the #13 class in 2007.
Finally, using a different site, I wondered who had the worst recruiting class this year. The winner (or loser)? UAB, which may be killing its football program. It's ranked #137, just below Western Illinois.
UPDATE
I ran a correlation of the 2013 class rankings (Yahoo Data) versus the 2014-2015 season final rankings. It's not great, r = .42. I had to cook the data a bit as some schools with top classes didn't finish in the top 38 teams. In those four cases (Florida, Michigan, South Carolina, and Vanderbilt), I ranked them all 39th. A scatterplot of the data is below. I didn't bother flipping the data, so low = better.
1 comment:
You should correlate two years out - so many recruits redshirt a year, I'm guessing you'll see a bigger impact from a recruiting class 2-3 years down the road.
Post a Comment